Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Mar;34(3):195-201. doi: 10.1007/s40261-013-0164-z.

Comparative pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of gemifloxacin administered as an intravenous 200 mg formulation or an oral 320 mg tablet.

Kim MJ, Lim HS, Cho SH, Bae KS.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Gemifloxacin is a synthetic fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent, which has potent activity against most Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms. It is indicated for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical potential of a new gemifloxacin 200 mg intravenous formulation by comparing its pharmacokinetic characteristics with those of the branded Factive(®) gemifloxacin tablet.

METHODS:

A single-dose, open-label, randomized-sequence, two-period crossover study was performed with 17 healthy male volunteers. The two treatment periods were separated by a 1-week washout period. Blood samples were taken for up to 48 h post-dose. Plasma gemifloxacin concentrations were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. To calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters, noncompartmental analysis was performed. The two formulations were considered to be pharmacokinetically equivalent if the 90 % confidence intervals (CIs) of the log-transformed ratios (intravenous/oral formulations) of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUClast) and the AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) were within the standard bioequivalence range (0.8-1.25). Safety and tolerability were evaluated on the basis of physical examinations, vital signs, electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory tests and adverse event monitoring.

RESULTS:

Seventeen subjects were enrolled, and 15 subjects completed the study. Sixteen subjects received intravenous 200 mg gemifloxacin and 15 received oral 320 mg gemifloxacin. The 15 subjects in the pharmacokinetic analysis set had a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, height and weight of 27.2 (5.3) years, 173.5 (4.4) cm and 67.3 (7.4) kg, respectively. Both formulations had similar pharmacokinetic profiles. For the intravenous formulation, the mean (SD) AUClast, AUC∞ and maximum plasma concentration (C max) values were 9.12 (4.03) μg·h/mL, 9.26 (4.07) μg·h/mL and 2.90 (1.65) μg/mL, respectively, while these values for the oral formulation were 9.44 (3.34) μg·h/mL, 9.60 (3.49) μg·h/mL and 2.03 (0.95) μg/mL, respectively. For the intravenous and oral formulations, the median (range) time to reach C max (t max) values were 0.9 (0.7-1.0) and 1.0 (0.5-2.0) h, respectively. The mean relative bioavailability was 68.99 %. The 90 % CI of the ratios of the log-transformed values of AUClast and AUC∞ was 0.82-1.07. There were no serious adverse events. The intravenous and oral formulations were associated with treatment-emergent adverse event incidences of 63 % (10/16) and 13 % (2/15), respectively. After the intravenous formulation was administered, application site pain and paraesthesia were the most frequently reported adverse events (31 and 25 %, respectively). All adverse events resolved spontaneously without treatment.

CONCLUSION:

Intravenous 200 mg and oral 320 mg formulations of gemifloxacin are equivalent in terms of AUC following a single dose in healthy male subjects.

PMID:

24385283

DOI:

10.1007/s40261-013-0164-z