Clin Ther. 2015 Mar 1;37(3):563-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Feb 16.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor and prasugrel in healthy male Koreanvolunteers.

Jeon HS, Kim MJ, Choi HY, Kim YH, Kim EH, Kim AR, Park HJ, Bae KS, Lim HS.

Erratum in

• Clin Ther. 2015 Sep 1;37(9):2149.

•  

Abstract

 

 

PURPOSE:

A combination of clopidogrel and aspirin is the standard treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Two novel antiplatelet agents, ticagrelor and prasugrel, have been shown to rapidly and more effectively inhibit the P2Y12 receptor compared with clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ticagrelor and prasugrel in healthy male Korean volunteers.

 

METHODS:

Two separate studies were conducted. One study was performed by using a single-sequence, open-label, crossover design in 12 volunteers who received a single oral dose of ticagrelor (180 mg) and then a single oral dose of prasugrel (60 mg for 4 volunteers and 30 mg for 8 volunteers) with a 7-day washout period. The other study was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group investigation in which 8 volunteers received a single oral dose of prasugrel (10 mg for 4 volunteers and 30 mg for 4 volunteers). In each study, blood samples for PK and platelet aggregation inhibition analysis were serially collected after the administration of each dose. Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor, AR-C124910XX (the active metabolite of ticagrelor), R-95913 (the inactive metabolite of prasugrel), and R-138727 (the active metabolite of prasugrel) were measured by using a validated LC-MS/MS method. PK was analyzed by using a noncompartmental method. Maximal platelet aggregations were assessed with light transmission aggregometry after induction with 20 μmol/L of adenosine diphosphate.

 

FINDINGS:

Twenty healthy male Korean volunteers participated in the 2 studies. Plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were obtained from 12 subjects, R-95913 from 20 subjects, and R-138727 from 8 subjects. Both ticagrelor and prasugrel were rapidly absorbed, with the shortest median Tmax of 2.0 and 2.25 hours for ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX, respectively, and a Tmax of 0.5 hour for both R-95913 and R-138727. Strong inhibition of platelet aggregation was shown after administration of both ticagrelor and prasugrel, with slightly stronger and more rapid inhibition with prasugrel in the tested doses. Inhibitory activities of prasugrel lasted longer than those of ticagrelor, reflecting the difference in binding kinetics between the 2 drugs.

 

IMPLICATIONS:

Prasugrel 30 and 60 mg exhibited slightly stronger, more rapid, and sustainable platelet inhibitory effects compared with ticagrelor 180 mg. These differing effects should be considered when determining the efficacy and adverse effects of ticagrelor and prasugrel. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01876797 and NCT02075268.

Copyright © 2015 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.

 

KEYWORDS:

antiplatelet agents; healthy volunteers; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; prasugrel; ticagrelor

 

PMID:

25697420

DOI:

10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.01.010